By J.C. Aldred in Witches — 21 Apr 2026

The Pendle Witches: What the Trial Records Actually Say

In August 1612, twenty people stood trial at Lancaster Assizes on charges of witchcraft. Twelve of them came from the area around Pendle Hill in Lancashire — a bleak stretch of moorland rising to just over 1,800 feet, visible for miles across the surrounding farmland. Ten of the Pendle accused were hanged.

The Pendle witch trials are the best-documented witch trials in English history. We know more about what happened in that Lancashire courtroom than we know about almost any comparable event of the period, because a clerk named Thomas Potts was commissioned to write it all down. His account, The Wonderfull Discoverie of Witches in the Countie of Lancaster, was published the following year and has been in print, in various forms, ever since.

Most accounts of Pendle lead with the question: were they really witches? It is the wrong question. The more interesting one is: what do the trial records actually tell us?

What the Records Contain

Potts's account is not a neutral document. It was written with the approval of the judges and dedicated to powerful men with an interest in the outcome. It is a piece of advocacy as much as reportage. But it is also specific — names, dates, places, accusations, confessions — in a way that allows a careful reader to see through the official narrative to something closer to the ground.

What the records show, above all, is poverty.

The Pendle accused came from two families: the Devices, associated with a woman called Elizabeth Southerns — known as Old Demdike — and the Chattoxes, headed by Anne Whittle, known as Old Chattox. Both women were elderly, both were poor, and both had long-standing reputations in the local community as practitioners of folk magic — what contemporaries called cunning craft.

This was not unusual. The countryside of early modern England was full of people who sold charms, healed animals, identified thieves, and performed the minor magical services that their neighbours found useful and the church found troubling. The line between cunning woman and witch was drawn by accusation, not by practice. Old Demdike and Old Chattox had been operating on the tolerated side of that line for years, possibly decades. What changed in 1612 was not what they were doing but who was paying attention.

The Mechanism of Accusation

The trials were triggered, in part, by a nine-year-old girl.

Alison Device, granddaughter of Old Demdike, was accused of laming a pedlar named John Law in late March 1612. The local magistrate, Roger Nowell, began an investigation. What followed was a process that will be recognisable to anyone who has studied how witch trials spread: each accusation generated new ones, each confession named accomplices, and the logic of the legal process required that accusations be taken seriously and investigated further.

Nowell was not a credulous man driven by superstition. He was a justice of the peace performing his duties under statutes that made witchcraft a capital offence, in a county where the assizes were approaching and where presenting a significant case would do his reputation no harm. The institutional incentives all pointed in the same direction.

The confessions that Potts records are worth reading closely. Several of them were made by children or extracted under conditions that make their reliability difficult to assess. Jennet Device, aged around nine, gave testimony against her own mother, Elizabeth Device, and her brother James. The use of child testimony in witch trials was controversial even at the time; it would become a flashpoint in later trials, including the Salem proceedings of 1692, where Jennet's case was explicitly cited.

What the confessions describe — meetings at Malkin Tower, familiars, acts of maleficium against named individuals — follows a recognisable template. These were the things people were supposed to confess to, and under sufficient pressure, they confessed to them.

The Families Behind the Accusations

What gets lost in the supernatural drama is the mundane reality of the two families at the centre of the trials.

Old Demdike and Old Chattox were rivals. There is evidence in the records of a long-running dispute between the Device and Chattox families — livestock deaths, accusations and counter-accusations, the kind of grinding local enmity that accumulates over years in a community where everyone knows everyone and grudges have nowhere to go. The witch trial gave this enmity a formal arena.

The Device family in particular seems to have been in genuine distress. Elizabeth Device was described as physically disabled — she had a squint so severe that it was noted at trial as a mark against her. James Device, her son, appears in the records as a young man with few resources and no prospects. The family depended partly on their grandmother's reputation as a cunning woman, a reputation that was both their livelihood and, ultimately, their undoing.

The Pendle witches were not an organised coven. They were two poor families with a long dispute between them, caught in the machinery of a legal system that had decided to take the question of witchcraft seriously.

What Pendle Hill Remembers

The landscape of Pendle has absorbed the story entirely. The hill itself — a long, flat-topped ridge that the locals call the Big End — sits over the valley towns like a presence. On clear days you can see it from Yorkshire. On bad days, when the cloud comes down, it disappears into the weather entirely.

The villages at its foot — Newchurch in Pendle, Barley, Roughlee — have made a particular kind of peace with their history. Newchurch has a church with an eye carved into the tower, said by local tradition to ward off witches, though historians are less certain of the date and purpose. Roughlee was the home of Alice Nutter, one of the ten hanged, the only member of the accused who was neither poor nor obviously part of the cunning folk tradition. Her presence in the dock has puzzled historians ever since.

Alice Nutter's motive for attending the meeting at Malkin Tower — if she attended it at all — remains unexplained. Some have suggested Catholic recusancy as a factor: the Nutter family had connections to the old faith, and the early seventeenth century was a difficult time to hold those connections. Others suggest simple misidentification, a case of the wrong Alice Nutter being named. The records do not resolve it.

Why 1612

Witch trials were not constant. They clustered in particular periods, driven by a combination of legal changes, political climate, and local conditions. The early seventeenth century was one of those periods in England — James I had come to the throne in 1603 with a published book on demonology to his name and a personal interest in the prosecution of witches, and the Witchcraft Act of 1604, passed in his first year, significantly strengthened the legal basis for capital prosecution.

Lancashire in 1612 was also a county with particular anxieties. It was known as a stronghold of Catholic recusancy — the practice of remaining loyal to Rome after the Reformation — and the line between recusancy and sedition was always a fine one in the minds of Protestant authorities. The Gunpowder Plot was only seven years past. Roger Nowell's energetic investigation of the Pendle cases may have been driven partly by a desire to demonstrate his county's loyalty and vigilance.

The accused were not victims of this political context in any simple sense. But the context shaped the conditions under which accusations became prosecutions, and prosecutions became hangings.

What the Records Contain

The Mechanism of Accusation

The Families Behind the Accusations

What Pendle Hill Remembers

Why 1612

Further Reading

Subscribe to The Chalk & Thorn